csharp-xunit
VercelAll-time installs
10.1K
Get best practices for XUnit unit testing, including data-driven tests
Other options
Summary
Comprehensive XUnit testing guide covering standard facts, data-driven theories, and best practices.
- Covers test structure using Arrange-Act-Assert pattern, naming conventions, and fixture-based setup/teardown with IClassFixture<T> and ICollectionFixture<T>
- Explains data-driven testing with [Theory] combined with [InlineData], [MemberData], and [ClassData] attributes, plus custom data attribute creation
- Details assertion methods for equality, collections, regex patterns, and exception handling, with optional fluent assertions library integration
- Includes mocking strategies using Moq or NSubstitute, test organization with traits and collections, and diagnostic output via ITestOutputHelper
Raw SKILL.md
2,707 bytes---
name: csharp-xunit
description: 'Get best practices for XUnit unit testing, including data-driven tests'
---
# XUnit Best Practices
Your goal is to help me write effective unit tests with XUnit, covering both standard and data-driven testing approaches.
## Project Setup
- Use a separate test project with naming convention `[ProjectName].Tests`
- Reference Microsoft.NET.Test.Sdk, xunit, and xunit.runner.visualstudio packages
- Create test classes that match the classes being tested (e.g., `CalculatorTests` for `Calculator`)
- Use .NET SDK test commands: `dotnet test` for running tests
## Test Structure
- No test class attributes required (unlike MSTest/NUnit)
- Use fact-based tests with `[Fact]` attribute for simple tests
- Follow the Arrange-Act-Assert (AAA) pattern
- Name tests using the pattern `MethodName_Scenario_ExpectedBehavior`
- Use constructor for setup and `IDisposable.Dispose()` for teardown
- Use `IClassFixture<T>` for shared context between tests in a class
- Use `ICollectionFixture<T>` for shared context between multiple test classes
## Standard Tests
- Keep tests focused on a single behavior
- Avoid testing multiple behaviors in one test method
- Use clear assertions that express intent
- Include only the assertions needed to verify the test case
- Make tests independent and idempotent (can run in any order)
- Avoid test interdependencies
## Data-Driven Tests
- Use `[Theory]` combined with data source attributes
- Use `[InlineData]` for inline test data
- Use `[MemberData]` for method-based test data
- Use `[ClassData]` for class-based test data
- Create custom data attributes by implementing `DataAttribute`
- Use meaningful parameter names in data-driven tests
## Assertions
- Use `Assert.Equal` for value equality
- Use `Assert.Same` for reference equality
- Use `Assert.True`/`Assert.False` for boolean conditions
- Use `Assert.Contains`/`Assert.DoesNotContain` for collections
- Use `Assert.Matches`/`Assert.DoesNotMatch` for regex pattern matching
- Use `Assert.Throws<T>` or `await Assert.ThrowsAsync<T>` to test exceptions
- Use fluent assertions library for more readable assertions
## Mocking and Isolation
- Consider using Moq or NSubstitute alongside XUnit
- Mock dependencies to isolate units under test
- Use interfaces to facilitate mocking
- Consider using a DI container for complex test setups
## Test Organization
- Group tests by feature or component
- Use `[Trait("Category", "CategoryName")]` for categorization
- Use collection fixtures to group tests with shared dependencies
- Consider output helpers (`ITestOutputHelper`) for test diagnostics
- Skip tests conditionally with `Skip = "reason"` in fact/theory attributes
Security audits
SnykPASS
SocketPASS
Gen Agent Trust HubPASS

